Information Related to "Editorial: Self-Esteem or Self-Worth?"
| Audio/Video |
In the 1980s the self-esteem movement began sweeping through society. It was assumed that people needed a healthy dose of compliments—regardless of their performance or actions—in order to be happy and successful. The gurus of self-esteem told us that all we needed to do was to love ourselves more, accept ourselves unconditionally and respond to any shortcomings with self-nurturing affirmations that we're good enough just as we are.
It sounded so great and felt so good to think of ourselves as successful, regardless of what had been said or done, that millions of parents and teachers accepted the premise. Young people began receiving participation awards instead of ones based on hard work and accomplishment. Anyone who was unsuccessful or discouraged was diagnosed as suffering from low self-esteem.
The movement penetrated churches, and supposed scriptural support was discovered in the biblical instruction to "love your neighbor as yourself" (Leviticus 19:18; Matthew 19:19). And it felt good to love ourselves. After all, how could we love our neighbor if we didn't first love ourselves? Yet the biblical directive here is based on the premise that we already love ourselves. It doesn't imply that we need to build up more self-love.
In February of this year, five psychologists turned the tables on the popular perception that the self-esteem movement has been good for us. Having administered the Narcissistic Personality Inventory to 16,000 college students between 1982 and 2006, these psychologists found that "narcissism and entitlement among college students are at an all-time high" ("Gen Y Loves Itself Too Much, SDSU Study Reports," http://advancement.sdsu.edu/marcomm/news/releases/spring2007).
Related Information on UCG Sites:
Table of Contents that includes "Editorial: Self-Esteem or Self-Worth?"
Other Articles by David Treybig
Teens and health: