Information Related to "Creation or Evolution: Which Is More Believable?"
| Audio/Video |
Science still asks many questions about the origin of life on earth. For example, New Scientist magazine has written: "There is much about planet earth that remains frustratingly unknown. How did it form from a cloud of dust? How did it manage to nurture life?" (Stuart Clark, "Unknown Earth: Our Planet's Seven Biggest Mysteries," Sept. 7, 2008).
Yet many scientists claim to understand the big picture. They generally
say that the planets circling the sun "all formed from the same cloud of
gas and dust that surrounded the sun at its centre, dust grains collided
and stuck to each other, growing in size and generating ever larger gravitational
fields. These clumps collided and merged, building the planets we
know today. That's the big picture" (ibid., emphasis added throughout).
But is it really? Who in fact truly possesses the big picture? Do not Darwinians and other proponents of evolution casually overlook the truths revealed by the divine Creator who "inhabits eternity"? (Isaiah 57:15).
A large percentage of scientists believe the formation of our planet is the product of unplanned accidents. Likewise, the origin of life and all its marvelous complexity, they believe, is nothing more than the result of a series of chance events.
Related Information on UCG Sites:
Table of Contents that includes "Creation or Evolution: Which Is More Believable?"
Other Articles by John Ross Schroeder
Evolution and religion: