Information Related to "Surprising Archaeological Find: Proof of Jesus' Existence?"
Good News subscriptionAudio/Video
view Beyond Today

The Good News Magazine

January/February 2003 Issue

Cover Feature:

Articles:

Regular Features:

|GN44|

Controversy Over the Term 'Brother'

One long-debated issue that has resurfaced with the recent ossuary discovery is whether James was really the half brother of Jesus.To maintain the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary (which holds that Mary remained a virgin even after Jesus' birth and had no more children), Roman Catholics teach James was only a "cousin" of Jesus.

Yet the biblical evidence points to James being a half brother, not a cousin, of Jesus, since Mary was his mother and Joseph his father. The Bible does not call Jesus the only son of Mary; it calls Him the firstbornson. "Then Joseph, being aroused from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took to him his wife, and did not know her till she had brought forth her firstbornSon. And he called His name Jesus" (Matthew 1:24-25, emphasis added throughout).

Note also that the word knowis the biblical euphemism for Joseph and Mary having sexual relations as husband and wife after Jesus was born.

The Gospels consistently show that Joseph and Mary had children other than Jesus. For instance, Mark 6:3 says: "Is this not the carpenter, the Son of Mary, and brother of James, Joses, Judas, and Simon? And are not His sisters here with us?"

Also, Paul calls James "the Lord's brother"(Galatians 1:19). The term used here for "brother," adelphos,means a brother, not a cousin. Paul uses a different Greek word that means "cousin," anepsios,in Colossians 4:10:"Aristarchus my fellow prisoner greets you, with Mark the cousin of Barnabas." So the idea that James was a cousin of Jesus has no biblical basis.

Another line of argument is presented by the Greek Orthodox Church, which also believes in the perpetual virginity of Mary but holds that James was Joseph's son by a supposed previous marriage, making him merely Jesus' stepbrother,having no immediate blood relation.Yet a close blood relation seems implicit in the distinction "brother of Jesus."And again, the idea of children by previous marriage is also contradicted by Matthew 1:24-25, which calls Jesus Mary's firstbornson and states that Joseph "knew her" after Jesus was born.


"James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus,"
reads this inscription.

Corroborating evidence is found in Psalm 69, a psalm written by Israel's King David but widely recognized as messianic in content-prophesying the suffering of Jesus. David prefigures Christ lamenting,"I have become a stranger to my brothers, and an alien to my mother's children" (jam)-showing that Jesus' brothers were children of Joseph and Mary, not just of Joseph by a previous marriage.

Moreover, when Joseph fled to Egypt before the massacre of the young boys in Bethlehem, an angel appeared to Joseph and told him,"Arise, take the young Child and His mother; flee to Egypt . . ." (Matthew 2:13). It's apparent that the only ones in that family were Joseph, Mary and Jesus. No other brothers or sisters were there from a supposed previous marriage of Joseph. Jesus was clearly the firstborn son, and later Joseph and Mary had several other sons and daughters.

 

 
 
 
The End of the World: What Does the Bible Say?

Surprising Archaeological Find:
Proof of Jesus' Existence?

Have scholars found firm evidence of the existence of Jesus Christ, His earthly father and one of His half brothers? An intriguing find bears their names.

by Mario Seiglie

This rather plain 20-inch limestone ossuary, a burial box for bones, bears on its side a remarkable inscription identifying it as having belonged to "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus." The style of the inscription dates it to around A.D. 62, the year James, brother of Jesus, was martyred.The box was apparently unearthed in Jerusalem.

Photos courtesy Biblical Archaeology Society, Washington, D.C.

First it was the name of the Roman governor Pontius Pilate found in a monument in Caesarea, Israel, in 1961.

Then came the discovery in 1990 in Jerusalem of an ossuary, a burial box for bones, bearing the name of Caiaphas, the high priest who condemned Jesus. Just recently it appears the most spectacular of all archaeological finds relating to Jesus has surfaced.

Another ossuary has come to light, this one bearing the names of Jesus, James and Joseph, three of the most prominent people in the New Testament. The ancient Aramaic words inscribed on the limestone box state that it belonged to "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus."

In late October André Lemaire, a specialist in ancient inscriptions and professor at the Sorbonne in Paris, announced the discovery of the stone container with the extraordinary script. An Israeli collector, Oded Golan, had purchased the box from an Arab antiquities dealer more than a decade ago. Mr. Golan had not thought the artifact important until Professor Lemaire examined it. In fact, although Mr. Golan had read the inscription, he hadn't connected it with the biblical Jesus.

Read the full article at www.gnmagazine.org/issues/gn44/existence.htm


Related Information on UCG Sites:

Table of Contents that includes "Surprising Archaeological Find: Proof of Jesus' Existence?"
Other Articles by Mario Seiglie

James:

Jesus' existence: Jesus' human life: Archaeology: Search Our Site
Key Subjects Index
General Topics Index
Biblical References Index
Good News Magazine Index
Booklets and All Literature Index
Home Page of this site