Information Related to "Archaeology and Genesis: What Does the Record Show?"
Good News subscriptionAudio/Video
view Beyond Today
GN Cover November/December 1996

Good News Logo
November/December 1996 - Volume 1, Number 6

© 1996, United Church of God, an International Association


FEATURE ARTICLE - The Bible and Archaeology
Archaeology and Genesis: What Does the Record Show?

by Mario Seiglie

n the September-October issue, The Good News examined several archaeological finds that illuminate portions of the book of Genesis. In this issue we continue our exploration of discoveries that verify the accuracy of other aspects of the Genesis account, beginning with the biblical patriarch Abraham.

Abraham and the city of Ur

"And Terah took his son Abram and his grandson Lot, . . . and they went out with them from Ur of the Chaldeans to go to the land of Canaan" (Genesis 11:31).

A century ago, German liberal critic Theodor Nöldeke questioned the historical existence of Abraham and of "Ur of the Chaldeans." He, along with others, regarded the Genesis account of Abraham and his descendants as fictional. Yet this century has brought to light an enormous amount of evidence to back the biblical record of Abraham.

In 1922 Leonard Woolley thoroughly excavated the city of Ur in southern Iraq and found it had been a thriving metropolis around 2000 B.C., precisely the time of Abraham. Based on his findings, Woolley even drew a map of the city that showed its orderly boulevards and made up blueprints of spacious dwellings with indoor baths. Classrooms were excavated that yielded schoolchildren's tablets with lessons on grammar and arithmetic still visible. In addition, variations on the name Abraham were found that dated to a century or two after his death.

The International Standard Encyclopedia, rejecting Nöldeke's theory that Abraham was a mythical figure, concludes: "From the archaeological evidence it is apparent that Abraham was the product of an advanced culture, and was typical of the upper-class patriarch of his day: His actions are set against a well-authenticated background of non-biblical material, making him a true son of his age who bore the same name and traversed the same general territory, as well as living in the same towns, as his contemporaries. He is in every sense a genuine Middle Bronze Age person, and not a retrojection of later Israelite historical thought, as used to be imagined . . ." (Vol. 1, 1979, p. 17).

Read the full article at www.gnmagazine.org/issues/gn07/archaeologygenesisrecord.htm


Related Information on UCG Sites:

Table of Contents that includes "Archaeology and Genesis: What Does the Record Show?"
Other Articles by Mario Seiglie

Genesis:

Bible inspiration: Archaeology: Search Our Site
Key Subjects Index
General Topics Index
Biblical References Index
Good News Magazine Index
Booklets and All Literature Index
Home Page of this site