Information Related to "Earth's Age: Does the Bible Indicate a Time Interval Between the First and Second Verses of Genesis?"
Good News subscriptionAudio/Video
view Beyond Today
From the publisher of The Good News magazine.
Is the Bible True?
Request this FREE booklet
View booklet in PDF format
Beyond Today
Internet TV Program
Is the Bible True?
Related Articles
Keys to a Successful Bible Study
Can You Prove the Bible Is True?
The Bible and Archaeology
Read the Book
The Bible is Like...
Isn't It About Time You Read the Book?
Keys to Unlocking Understanding of the Bible
Extraterrestrial Life: What Does the Bible Say?
The Battle Over the Bible
Has the Bible Been Preserved Accurately?
How Did We Get the Bible?
FREE...
Bible Study Course
 

Earth's Age: Does the Bible Indicate a Time Interval Between the First and Second Verses of Genesis?

We are introduced to the account of the creation of the earth in Genesis 1:1-2: "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep."

The original Hebrew wording, combined with a comparison to other passages of Scripture, has led some to conclude that a considerable time interval is indicated between these two verses. If such an interval is indeed intended, there is no discrepancy between the Bible record and scientific determinations that the earth is up to several billion years old. If, on the other hand, there is no such gap, then the earth itself must be only around 6,000 years old-which most scientists consider an impossibility.

Do other passages, as well as history, shed any light on this question?

Some scholars propose that Genesis 1:2 can or should be translated "Now the earth became without form, and void... " as opposed to the common rendering "The earth was without form, and void... " Others dismiss this idea entirely. They assume the original Hebrew word hayah must be translated "was" and then assume the earth was originally created in this disorderly way.

However, as can be seen from many Bible helps, both translations of the term are possible. Only the context of the chapter and book can determine which one is correct. Gleason Archer, professor of biblical languages, comments: "It should be noted in this connection that the verb was in Genesis 1:2 may quite possibly be rendered 'became' and be construed to mean: 'And the earth became formless and void.' Only a cosmic catastrophe could account for the introduction of chaotic confusion into the original perfection of God's creation. This interpretation certainly seems to be exegetically tenable..." (A Survey of Old Testament Introduction, 1974, p. 184).

Read the full article at www.ucg.org/booklets/BT/versesofgenesis.htm


Related Information on UCG Sites:

Table of Contents that includes "Earth's Age: Does the Bible Indicate a Time Interval Between the First and Second Verses of Genesis?"

Earth:

Creation: Search Our Site
Key Subjects Index
General Topics Index
Biblical References Index
Good News Magazine Index
Booklets and All Literature Index
Home Page of this site